Capto had 2 options (distance putted based on a speed-based distance graph, which is 4.1mph = 10ft vs distance with energy loss implemented) and I used distance with energy loss implemented. Trackman 4 was on point with 9.3ft, GCQ at 8.2ft, and Capto at 10.9ft. Skid Distance (TM4/Quad): Quad seemed to have about 2 inches longer or TM4 2 inches shorter.ĭistance putted in-app (TM4/Quad/Capto) vs Real putted distance: Avg for real distance putted was 9.3ft. For putting that was about 0.5-1ft difference. Capto’s calculated speed was also consistent but slightly less by 0.2mph. Ball Speed is always derived from Club speed x 1.635).īall Speed (TM4/Quad/Capto): TM4/Quad as before were nearly identical. For Capto also, calculated measurements have settings you can choose from (e.g.For Capto, you have 4 options you can choose which will give you 2 separate results: Plumb/Address mode which will give you Lie/Loft differences, and Target/Free mode which will give you Face Angle difference.I putted mostly on 5mph putts which went about 9ft.I used the same ball throughout the entire test (Titleist Pro V1X).All software was up-to-date as of Apr 2020. For FSX2020 and Capto, I set the Stimp in-game set to 10. I used all 2 launch monitors to test out the variances, and for data output, I used FSX2020, Trackman Putting Software, Capto app, and Blast Motion app.The Stimp for my green is around 10 (validated with my USGA Stimpmeter). I have a flat putting turf from ball to screen about 13 feet.As you guys know, Trackman 4 and GCQuad are launch monitors whereas Capto and Blast Motion are devices that get attached to the club and therefore only do club data. I will be hoping to add and compare SAM PuttLab and Quintic once COVID-19 is over. This time, I wanted to expand to different devices, and I was able to add Capto and Blast Motion into the mix. Overall, lessons with the Capto putting system can provide golfers with valuable insights, personalised instruction, and real-time feedback to help them improve their putting performance.I’ve already compared Trackman 4 vs GCQuad vs GC2 in putting previously at By comparing their current metrics to previous sessions, golfers can see how they’re putting stroke has improved and identify any areas that still need work. Track progress over time: The Capto putting system allows golfers to track their progress over time. This immediate feedback enables them to make adjustments and see the impact of those adjustments in real-time, helping them to develop better putting mechanics more quickly.ĥ. Real-time feedback: With the Capto putting system, golfers receive instant feedback on their putting stroke. This eliminates any subjective biases or guesswork and allows both the golfer and the instructor to have a clear understanding of the areas that need improvement.Ĥ. Objective feedback: The Capto putting system provides objective data on various aspects of a golfer's putting stroke. The system's extensive data collection and analysis capabilities allow instructors to identify specific areas for improvement and provide personalised instruction based on the golfer's unique tendencies and patterns.ģ. Customised instruction: Capto lessons are tailored to the individual golfer's needs and goals. By analysing key metrics such as face angle, path direction, and impact position, it provides valuable feedback and guidance to help golfers make adjustments and improve your putting stroke.Ģ. Improved putting performance: The Capto putting system is designed to help golfers improve their putting skills and performance.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |